- hperrin@lemmy.caEnglish3 days
Once a cheater, always a cheater. We’re speaking specifically about the CPU here. That CPU is a cheater. Fuck that CPU.
- Dreamcatcher@lemmy.zipEnglish3 days
Maybe they should try banning that disgusting and vile CPU instead of the innocent player.
- Dreamcatcher@lemmy.zipEnglish2 days
Maybe we should ban all CPUs because they can be used for cheating. What do you think?
thingsiplay@lemmy.mlEnglish
2 daysThe CPU isn’t a cheater. The user of the CPU was the cheater. Banning a user who did not cheat is wrong. So no, do not fuck that CPU, fuck the anticheat system that gone too far.
thingsiplay@lemmy.mlEnglish
2 daysYeah I can see it now. Just woke up and you got me with that line. :-p
- 1Fuji2Taka3Nasubi@piefed.zipEnglish2 days
I remember the time when there was an uproar when Intel tried to add unique ID instructions, so I was surprised to learn that CPUs can now be uniquely identified via software, but apparently it is true via fTPM.
☂️-@lemmy.mlEnglish
2 daysclient side anti cheat was already overzealous.
these people look like they are gonna block everyone until nobody can play their damn game lmao.
- QueenHawlSera@piefed.socialEnglish2 days
You lived in the same state as someone who cheated, YOU’RE BANNED!
BeBopALouie@lemmy.caEnglish
2 daysJust have it removed from game makers database or would that be a nightmare in itself?







