This isn’t a mathematical equation.

All squares are rectangles, but not all rectangles are squares. AI is the rectangle and LLMs are the squares.

I’m not saying it’s a justification here, but the principle of least access is an important part of security best practices.

There are completely valid reasons to restrict what information can be shared.

Sounds like the only ethical thing to do is pirate it.

LLM = AI

AI ≠ LLM

A concrete, concise answer that’s often confidently incorrect.

I’ve had MS Copilot first tell me to use a Microsoft product that was retired nearly a decade ago, and when called out it told me to use one that didn’t exist.

Also, the garbage web results are because of LLMs.

Because they always think they’re the exception and everyone else is doing it wrong.

It’s not uncommon with narcissists.

This lawsuit is saying that them agreeing to pump the brakes on AI development is anti-competitive. I hope nothing happens.

Get other people to join you.

That was literally the point that they were making.

Their not wrong, though. A lot has to change in this country to make meaningful action on climate change something that can actually happen. Regulatory capture is why they can do this in the first place.

It’s kinda like focusing on a broken window instead of putting out the fire the Molotov cocktail that broke the window started.

Yeah, the broken window absolutely needs to be addressed, but the house needs to not be on fire first.