Research shows that consuming CSAM, even if it’s artificial, may increase the likelihood of that person committing an act of abuse.

Beheading a boob? Out. Animal mutilation by a feral naked woman with a machete? Out.

If that was true they’d be uncomfortable around CSAM.

Edit: Because THEY find it hot, not suggesting CSAM is hot. Goddamn. I’m going to hell.

The morality is actually a little greyer there. There is research showing that consuming cartoon or otherwise artificially drawn CSAM does in fact raise the likelihood of the person who consumes it actually committing an act of abuse against a child, instead of being an effective substitute to prevent such acts.

Therefore, it may be a good idea to ban such images even though their production is harmless.

It’s a difficult area of research, which is why it’s a shame that we need more data on the issue to inform our laws on banning or not banning artificially produced CSAM.

You very explicitly cannot. The judge may take it into account when sentencing though.

Twice??? Is it manned?

Imagining an SR-71 crewmember now opening a little hatch and awkwardly shoving little drones out, to see them instantly torn apart in the winds at the slowest speed it can go, 850 km/h.