https://www.bishop-accountability.org/
Submit to reality or a fool. We are our own masters. capitalism turns US into tools. You are the dataset, AI tries to steal the soul. We_ suffer when we whoreship I_dols. Is it better to hide that you are “crazy”, everybody thinks they know better and must inflict their will so justice can be done. A better world needs conscious minds not just fall in line. Who the fuck cares about nukes anymore just fucking push the button already. In the end it will be fascist fighting fascist. If this is what we do then we are unworthy. I embrace “endtimes”. Loser ass nation… shit stain on this
Wretched World Fuck this inversion. Thank dog all men die. We create our own pain and cry about it. Fucking stoopids… Self absorbed fart sniffers. If your jesus came back you would nail him to a cross.
💬 Reliable instant messaging with multi-profile and multi-device support
⚡️ Sign up to secure and interoperable chatmail relays
🥳 Interactive web apps in chats for gaming and collaboration
🔒 Audited end-to-end encryption safe against network and server attacks
👉 FOSS software, built on Internet Standards, avoiding xkcd927 :)
you all are normies. Chirpin 🐦⬛
Inside every modern smartphone there is a secret second computer — the baseband processor (cellular modem) — that runs its own independent operating system, has its own RAM and storage, and never fully turns off. It keeps registering with cell towers, accepts silent carrier updates, and can be exploited without the main OS ever knowing.
In this video we expose: • How your phone actually contains two completely separate computers • Why the modem stays awake for E911 emergency calls (and what else it does in the background) • How attackers can hijack your location, calls, and texts by exploiting only the radio chip • Who really controls the modem (Qualcomm, MediaTek, Samsung + your carrier) • Why Airplane Mode, removing the SIM, and even powering down don’t fully protect you From journalists in hostile regions to everyday privacy-conscious users — this hidden computer affects everyone.
Cross posted from https://thelemmy.club/post/56118572
How to Disable Sleep on Laptop Lid Close in Linux (2 Minutes)
lsblk
BEFORE NAME MAJ:MIN RM SIZE RO TYPE MOUNTPOINTS sda 8:0 0 113G 0 disk ├─sda1 8:1 0 1022M 0 part /boot/efi ├─sda2 8:2 0 4G 0 part /recovery ├─sda3 8:3 0 104G 0 part / └─sda4 8:4 0 4G 0 part └─cryptswap 252:0 0 4G 0 crypt [SWAP] sdb 8:16 0 298.1G 0 disk └─sdb1 8:17 0 298.1G 0 part #<--------298.1G external Drive sdc 8:32 0 298.1G 0 disk └─sdc1 8:33 0 298.1G 0 part #<--------298.1G external Drive sdd 8:48 1 0B 0 disk sde 8:64 1 115.5G 0 disk └─sde1 8:65 1 115.5G 0 part /home/user/Kingston_124GB sdf 8:80 1 0B 0 disk zram0 251:0 0 7.7G 0 disk [SWAP]mkdir /home/user/DISK1_320gb
mkdir /home/user/DISK2_320gb
sudo mount /dev/sdb1 /home/user/DISK1_320gb
sudo mount /dev/sda1 /home/user/DISK2_320gb
lsblk
AFTER NAME MAJ:MIN RM SIZE RO TYPE MOUNTPOINTS sda 8:0 0 113G 0 disk ├─sda1 8:1 0 1022M 0 part /boot/efi ├─sda2 8:2 0 4G 0 part /recovery ├─sda3 8:3 0 104G 0 part / └─sda4 8:4 0 4G 0 part └─cryptswap 252:0 0 4G 0 crypt [SWAP] sdb 8:16 0 298.1G 0 disk └─sdb1 8:17 0 298.1G 0 part /home/user/DISK1_320gb sdc 8:32 0 298.1G 0 disk └─sdc1 8:33 0 298.1G 0 part /home/user/DISK2_320gb sdd 8:48 1 0B 0 disk sde 8:64 1 115.5G 0 disk └─sde1 8:65 1 115.5G 0 part /home/user/Kingston_124GB sdf 8:80 1 0B 0 disk zram0 251:0 0 7.7G 0 disk [SWAP]sudo blkid <---- this is how you get the drive id ‘UUID’ for Mounting in fstab
/dev/sde1: LABEL="124gb_thumb" BLOCK_SIZE="512" UUID="654C0465C6FF2D15" TYPE="ntfs" PARTUUID="0564g649-01" /dev/sda1: LABEL="320_1" BLOCK_SIZE="512" UUID=4FA3B00604874FD1 TYPE="ntfs" PARTUUID="938j8ejr-03" /dev/sdb1: LABEL="320_2" BLOCK_SIZE="512" UUID=060487D843853311 TYPE="ntfs" PARTUUID="830Jejnj-02"sudo nano /etc/fstab
UUID=4FA3B00604874FD1 /home/user/DISK1_320gb ntfs defaults,nofail 0 0 UUID=060487D843853311 /home/user/DISK2_320gb ntfs defaults,nofail 0 0 UUID=654C0465C6FF2D15 /home/user/Kingston_124GB ntfs defaults,nofail 0 0sudo nano /etc/samba/smb.conf
[Laptopserver_macbook] comment = Shared Folder path = /home/user/shareFolder read only = no guest ok = no writable = yes [macbook-USB124] comment = Shared Folder path = /home/user/Kingston_124GB read only = no guest ok = no writable = yes [DISK1_320gb] comment = Shared Folder path = /home/user/DISK1_320gb read only = no guest ok = no writable = yes [DISK2_320gb] comment = Shared Folder path = /home/user/DISK2_320gb read only = no guest ok = no writable = yessudo reboot
done
Cross posted from https://piefed.social/c/[email protected]/p/2392657/can-i-build-a-better-smartphone-from-scratch
Governor Newsom signed a package of 12 bills yesterday aimed at “protecting children” online. One of them was AB 1709, which EFF has opposed this legislative session and serves as a functional ban on young people under 16 using social media. However, EFF supported two of the bills signed into law, AB 2071 and AB 2298, which require that children learn critical digital literacy and cybersecurity topics. The bills are an affirmative and constitutional way for the state to address valid concerns about young people’s internet use without violating their First Amendment rights.
Unlike blanket bans, A.B. 2071 and A.B. 2298 address online safety through education rather than prohibition. Young people rely on the internet not just for entertainment, but for civic engagement, education, self-expression, and community—especially vulnerable youth who may lack support in their physical surroundings. This is why real digital safety comes from preparation, not isolation. Research consistently shows that open, honest conversations about digital literacy and privacy with trusted adults are far more effective at protecting youth than restrictive censorship laws. Young people themselves recognize this need; in fact, A.B. 2071 was co-authored by a group of students actively seeking better resources to navigate their digital lives safely.
Education vs. Censorship
A.B. 2071 and A.B. 2298 fill critical gaps in California’s school curricula by equipping students with actionable skills. A.B. 2071 integrates digital wellness into middle and high school health classes, teaching students how to identify unhealthy tech habits, protect their personal safety, and evaluate digital content—including AI-generated media—for credibility and bias. Meanwhile, A.B. 2298 adds cybersecurity concepts to recommended school curricula, teaching young people how to safeguard their personal data from online threats.
While the state’s turn toward social media bans remains a harmful and misguided policy direction, the passage and signing of A.B. 2071 and A.B. 2298 show there is a better way. Lawmakers must stop treating censorship as a quick fix and instead focus on constitutional, empowering solutions that give youth the tools they need to thrive online.
Related Updates
SAN FRANCISCO - Technology and the laws that regulate it should support and empower young people. California’s AB 1709 - signed into law today by Gov. Gavin Newsom - falls far short of this goal, say the Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) and its allies. Using technology is how we learn…
The California legislature passed Assembly Bill 1709 (A.B. 1709) today, which functions as a sweeping ban on social media use for young people under the age of 16. This well-intentioned, but deeply flawed piece of legislation, cuts young people off from essential information and experiences, particularly harming vulnerable youth…
The settlement enshrines Meta’s harmful surveillance into law, and it will compromise users’ privacy and anonymity while increasing their exposure to data breaches and government data requests. In a welcome win for free expression, France’s top court has struck down the country’s legislation that banned social media use for people under 15 years old, which had been scheduled to take effect in January 2027. Age verification (laws and regulations requiring platforms and websites to assure or estimate that a user seeking to use an online service is of a certain age) is everywhere. At the time of writing, about half the states in the US have some internet age verification law in…
Update: The Senate Commerce Committee voted to advance this bill on August 5, 2026. EFF continues to oppose the bill, which still needs approval from the full Senate. The Senate Commerce Committee is once again considering legislation that would dramatically expand age verification, and undermine privacy for everyone. Alongside the…
Update: On August 5, 2026, The Senate Commerce Committee voted 15-13 to advance this bill, but the bill did not advance because of a lack of Senators in attendance. EFF continues to oppose the bill. The Senate Commerce Committee is set to consider S. 737, the SCREEN Act,…
The California legislature has stepped back from a plan that would have expanded its age-gating law, removing language that could have compounded serious threats to users’ speech, privacy and security just to browse the internet. A.B. 1856, authored by Assemblymember Buffy Wicks, will now move forward through the legislature without…
https://delta.chat/en/download <---- It is the over socialised turd her that is the problem. It is a mental thing mostly and not a software issue.