hendrik

I’d say there’s likely something wrong with your service. Maybe it refuses serving on a domain it’s not configured for? Or there’s something wrong with the headers or something like that. Or the internal network. Anyway, the 502 error is sent by the Caddy server. That means everything from your browser to the Caddy server should be fine. You can reach it. There’s something wrong with the service or the parts in-between the reverse proxy and the application.

Yeah, they probably bought 2 RAM sticks and think they can now manipulate markets with a Lemmy post and turn it into a great investment.

Guess it just makes it easier for them. Back in the day they needed to task some employee per franchisee. Now it’s done by one central AI. And it enables more innovation. An AI can be quicker and more dynamic. Recalculate prices multiple times a day… In theory and now that they got those electronic checkouts plus AI they could customize the upselling to individual customers. And those kinds of things.

Yes, no shit Sherlock. Also why does the entire text read like it’s written by ChatGPT? Is it? Or did other AI service adopt this style of writing as well?

Make sure to tell us what was written, drawn or calculated by an AI.

If you actually use it, just be aware of the limitations. As far as I remember some GPT-4 based phishing detectors had roughly a 50% recall. That means every other phishing mail won’t be detected as such and probably end up being forwarded to the employees.

Well said. And I found computer stuff rarely to be a yes/no thing in the first place. It’s almost always a …well, depends… where are we going with this?.. there’s ten puzzle pieces which fit here and they all come with consequences and side-effects and form a different bigger picture.

I get the questions, though. And the desire for there to be simple answers to things like, should I install CachyOS? Should I buy 32GB of RAM, put a web application firewall infront of my webserver… There’s also a lot of opinions out there regarding those things.

Question is why, though. What are we trying to accomplish here? There’s better hobbies than gatekeeping stuff just for the sake of it?!

Or use a different platform or wait for Lemmy 1.0

Though it’s kind of written by a black box 😂 I mean it’ll generate a reason. But ultimately it remains a mystery why LLMs conclude what they do. You can probably use it to improve the prompt and compare models, though.

Maybe as another option, you could try to find a few other students and pool your money for a shared VPS? Back then I used to share an internet connection with few people to make it more affordable. We also used to share some storage space for stuff and the CS students did a website and an internal message board. I’m old, though. No clue how they do it as of today.

RSpamd can add the reasoning to the mail in a header.

LLM plugins should be available in standard spamfilters like Rspamd. Some mail servers like Stalwart have it as well. You pick a prompt and provide it with an OpenAI-compatible endpoint and it’ll ask the AI for every mail. Can be a local model.

Not sure if it’s in the Email clients as well. I found a few Thunderbird addons, but that was just a quick Google search.

Wow, I didn’t know. Are there any bigger projects out there doing this? Most I find when googling it, is a few YouTubers and people who do it small scale as some sort of tech demo.

Wonder what kind if cost we’re looking at, when “washing” a library like chardet. And whether that’s something available to robin-hood stuff from the rich, or if it’s just the other way around.

Why Manjaro, though? Isn’t CachyOS way more popular these days? And for good reasons?

Well, a webserver does not choose what it’s going to serve. I as the intelligent entity made that decision and put it in. The webserver executes it, but there’s no intelligence there. That’s all mine.

I think we’re pretty much at the distinction between classic computing and AI (minus things like expert systems). With traditional algorithms, the programmer puts in all the smarts. Decides what to do, how to tackle a problem, down to the mathematical operation. If X happens, then pull up some data and do Y. In case any Z happens, fail that way. All the intelligence in the process came from me, the programmer. And I made the judgements. With AI, we do not want that. We just put in the goal, and let -for example- reinforcement learning figure out what to do, and how to do it.

And with strong AI, we want even more than that. It’s supposed to do a broad range of tasks, including new ones. Main point being, it should be able to figure it out. Not borrow intelligence from a human who is then going to come in to change the webserver config or reprogram the KUKA industrial robot for a new car part.

I think what you’re describing is something more a traditional computer. Or an expert system. It has a lot of knowledge/data, but not any capacity to grow, learn, adapt, or figure out stuff on it’s own. We need to put that in beforehand, in detail. And we already have that. It’s how regular computers work.

I bet there is no way to construct pure intelligence. Once you embed something into the real world, it will result in complex interactions. It won’t necessarily be biological wants and needs. But I mean it needs power. And it better have some desire to “think” and learn. Or it might as well just sit there and do nothing all day?!

People like Asimov suggested it’d need to factor in things like not to nonchalantly harm humans. And lastly AI as in reinforcement learning foots on some goal and a score function being present.

(Edit: Also not sure how this relates to the philosophical concept of “agency”. There’s intelligence in the sense of knowledge of facts. Like Wikipedia is “intelligent”. But we want machines to do something. That requires them to pick an option what to do / how to proceed. I’m fairly sure that requires judgement and goals.)

I think it -unfortunately- goes that direction. It reproduces all kinds if bias and stereotypes. And due to the nature of it, the cost of training, the copyrighted data needed, it’s done by the big, nasty corporations, not us, the people. So it’s massively undemocratic. And that’s hard to remove from it. And unless we find good ways to change that very thing, it’s also particularly good at making stuff up. I mean we need a strong AI very different from today’s chatbots / LLMs to change any of this. At least in my opinion. But that seems far away and I struggle extrapolating from todays ChatGPTs which mainly flood the internet with fake stuff to someone’s benefit, to something useful to society. I mean we have no clue how that’d look like. So I have equally little clue what to do with it. It may be possible, though, in theory, to come up with a machine like that.

I’d for example like some household assistant robot which does all the chores. I think that’s in some scifi movies as well. But not so much make decisions for me or do the thinking. But that’s still a massive technological challenge. They currently all tip over while loading the dishwasher and cost a tremendous amount of money. And some dude in India is tele-operating them.

I guess strong AI could also do some of our jobs, robots could do some hard labour while we humans chill at the beach, or keep busy with space exploration. Guess we need some society like in Star Trek for that. With all our basic needs met. And money abolished, or transformed completely. It just won’t work with salaries and the capitalism we have today.

And if strong AI goes hand in hand with sentience, they obviously need some rights, and can’t be “products” of big companies. And then depending on the details, they might like to work as our slaves, or maybe they don’t. Maybe it’s okay to mess with their “brains” to update them or make them do what we want, or that might be massively unethical. Could be pretty much anything.

Sounds a bit like the question “How do I drive in this screw with my hammer?” I mean the best way to “integrate” it, is probably to leverage what it’s good at. Mass surveillance, fabricate “truth” and roll it out large scale. And go for some authoritarian society. We got enough sci-fi movies from the 80s and 90s. Rowing against the tide takes way more effort.