
I would like to look into the companies behind headlines like this. Like who owns them and who decides that these “innocent” little turns of phrase that deign corpos as helpless little victims

I would like to look into the companies behind headlines like this. Like who owns them and who decides that these “innocent” little turns of phrase that deign corpos as helpless little victims

Whats with this passive voice shit? Its chooses to layoff, its not hit by shit

The problem is a lot of this is checkmate. How do you reverse any of these massive changes your advocating? Pretty sure its going to require some majority or plurality of parties some many of whom may be similar to RI in their interest in not having their voice degraded? To be sure I’m not arguing they deserve the level of input they have but from a purely tactical perspective it seems like somethings are going to be infeasible to change by something other than fiat or unilateral
How do you do that non-violently or in some less than multilateral way

Its never been worse. The US has been checkmated by:

Perfect timing

Isnt watsapp number just your mobile number?

It would have had to have been
Wow, never realized we had such a weird grammatical construction. What tense is that even called?
Sure…