Thanks for coming back to report this. I’m sure others here were, like me, hoping we could reach you with positive messages and give you the confidence in yourself you deserve.
Stay strong and find your way. Write more articles here if you like. We’re wishing you well.
@[email protected], don’t fall for the (insanely voluminous) hype around LLM capabilities.
LLMs aren’t better than you even today. They will extrude mediocre code, far too verbosely, and inevitably lose track of what they are supposed to be doing. When asked to make a change, they will frequently change far too much. They will make a mess that no one understands, least of all the LLM.
You can do better than them, today and in the future, by being curious, reading to understand, intending what you write, and improving from mistakes. LLMs can do none of this, their design does not allow them to.
We shouldn’t even be in this situation, where just politely asking someone’s computer to delete files is effective.
Exactly, it’s a problem only for those who have knowingly handed their development environment over to obey commands from an untrustworthy source.
If you’re the one holding the syringe to your own vein and pushing the plunger, but you didn’t think to ask what’s inside first? That’s no one else’s fault.
This is a well targeted sabotage of a system that’s causing untold damage. Of course it’s going to annoy and surprise the people using the system it’s targeted to.
This is an unsurprising impression to form. But it’s false.
You are seeing a lot of people boosting the LLM’s capabilities, for many reasons.
Some of them are sincere, to a degree: they feel like they are doing more, because they’re churning out code so much faster! But they’re discounting or ignoring the downsides: They have far less comprehension of that code, they can’t possibly review it effectively, they don’t perceive the lost time trying to work the extruded output into something they can use; etc.
Some of them are insincere, because they’re grifting: hoping to hype others into committing more to this technology and to their apparent experience, for clout or money. Those people can die in a hole.
A lot of them are insincere, because they perceive it will hurt their short-term career to not spout enthusiastically about using LLMs for coding. Their bosses demand it be used, measure its use and rank employees based on token burn, and job adverts overwhelmingly seem to require use of LLMs. People pretend to love this stuff just to stay employed.
Don’t believe it just because people say it. Believe your own experience: you have seen how godawful is the code extruded from these slop machines. You have seen how voluminous and ignorant of context it all is, making it worse than useless to try integrating into an existing project. You have seen how the LLM can’t effectively maintain its own code medium-, let along long-term. It’s all and a colossal waste of effort and resources, a dead end.
Let people use the LLM for their own code if it makes them happy. But don’t accept it into your project if you don’t want it; and definitely don’t trust their self-reported productivity unless they bring the code, and you independently assess it. You’ll find very few claimed successes survive that simple scrutiny.