Now can the IFPI treat genAI vendors as “commercialized piracy outlets”?

When I first got into emulation as a very early teen, I’ve heard a rumor about an admin of an Amiga ROM site being shot to death for piracy. However, nothing similar comes to against those who do it on an industrial scale, specifically to destroy a portion of the human experience.

From what I’ve heard, the GPU in the M-series chips are just scaled-up PowerVR derived GPU, with some of the greatest limitations being carried over.

Also the CPU is more optimized for parallel-processing, and many games are still seldom optimized for that.

They fo, it’s just others benefit from the abuse

It can use a 32 bit microcontroller, like mine does, but it only has some pretty basic functionality like setting temperature and shutting down the fans if door opened. Anything beyond that is just overengineering.

Calling soyjak and kiwifarms just “Russian troll farms” really undersell the problem with them, but I guess since they regularly go after “anarkiddies”, it’s okay.

Wait until they give Doom to Activision, to create Call of Doom - UAC Mercenaries, a game where the hellspawn are replaced with striking UAC workers gone too far and dressing up as imps and such.

When he will finally rename the USA to Amerika Oblast?

How much you bet on that Trump will shut down the investigation, to protect AI?

“But I one shotted this barely functioning game in Astra!” 🤣🤣🤣

Halo to become Call of Duty In Space in 3…

EnshittyPi.

US tech firms want to undo Section 230, because they have the capacity to prefilter stuff (thanks to AI moderation) and to pay fines, but smaller providers such as the Fediverse don’t.