Amazing that somebody can write an article citing Cory Doctorow while missing literally everything has ever said about AI
I’ll be happy to check back in a month to see which toxic cesspit provides the best approximation of Photoshop-tier quality.
My bet isn’t with the Redditor whose profile reads “To AI haters: AI is just a tool… Adapt.” But their attitude is roughly as toxic as Adobe if you strip away the PR, so let them fight I guess
I don’t want a smart TV, but there’s only a couple non-smart brands left, and neither of them seem to have the best quality product on the market.
Considering it’s the domain for Slovenia, it’s understandable you’d assume L instead of i… Had double-check it myself.
Wonder how many .SL domains are out there and whether they have similar names for a much lower price.
There’s some cleverness behind it. The government is legally mandated to only refer to AI as SI, so that will theoretically boost the value of the squatted domains among the people obsessed with the stuff.
Even a gold rush can enrich a shovel salesman.
Even farther back - the biggest chunk was bought all the way back in July !
In July, there was a sudden spike in .SI (Slovenia) domain name sales, and now that Trump has announced AI will be rebranded SI, their owners are attempting to resell them for millions of dollars.
OpenAI is a megacorporation that pays people to read through your conversations, and flagged the killer’s account for threats of violence, but failed to follow up.
Can you explain how OpenAI is not guilty of negligence when they sell a product that promises they are careful?
People have been discussing it for months. I haven’t noticed it until now. Apparently you haven’t either… So I think you won’t be affected until you do something major.
What’s up with this deflection and corporate defense?
This article is all about negligence. OpenAI’s negligence.
If you believe they should escape criticism, could you please explain why, rather than using sarcasm?
OpenAI’s chatbot fed the school shooter’s violent fantasies and planning up to the massacre, our investigation reveals.
In June 2025, Jesse Van Rootselaar received an email notification from OpenAI. Van Rootselaar had been using ChatGPT to discuss committing potential acts of violence—including a mass shooting at a shopping mall—and now OpenAI had banned that account. But the troubled teen living in Tumbler Ridge, British Columbia, was not deterred and soon logged back on with a second account.
In case anybody doubted the corporation that was actively complicit.
The prime minister was asked if Altman apologised.
“Yes, he clearly … we can get into word games, but he clearly accepted that the company had not done good enough,” Albanese said.
Yeah, don’t worry, Americans don’t know what he’s actually saying half the time either.
Albanese said the incident was complex and unprecedented.
“It was a shock that it occurred because it was real and serious,” he said.
“But it also, I think, was something that had been predicted, including by the AI companies themselves.”
Right again. If only they could figure out what to do about it.
Australia is one of the countries banning teens from social media. Shouldn’t they be able to ban OpenAI from their country too? Just give Sammy and Co a restraining order? Certainly makes more sense than the social media stuff, as companies can actually be held liable for things they intentionally do.
I was just surprised that was your standard, not whining.
But if you want to call the article “misleading” and “utterly ridiculous” to criticize them, then that’s over the threshold from odd opinion to bad prescription
Sergey Brin acquired a $51 million waterfront mansion on Allison Island in Miami and listed Nevada as his official residence. He co-founded opposition PAC Building a Better California, which Fortune reported had raised more than $100 million as of August 2026, and told the New York Times, “I fled socialism with my family in 1979 and know the devastating, oppressive society it created in the Soviet Union.”
Yeah socialism is terrible. With its constant surveillance panopticon, and oligarchs who are above the law, and… Wait that’s just America.
You’re only slightly annoyed by an ad that requires you to subscribe to a service with a free trial, then cancel the trial, to remove?
And I thought any ad on a $2000 product was too much, even it it was as simple as closing with an X
“Wouldn’t ever be me,” I think smugly, opening the menu on my FOSS Firefox browser and being greeted with…
Infuriatingly for iOS users, the only way to disable these promos is to either let them expire — which in many cases could take weeks or even months, leaving a persistent notification badge on the Settings app in the meantime — or pay for the service being offered.
Infuriatingly for iOS users, the only way to disable these promos is to either let them expire — which in many cases could take weeks or even months, leaving a persistent notification badge on the Settings app in the meantime — or pay for the service being offered.
I thought that was a weird opener, but then they bring up the same thing a second time halfway down the article.