
There are some very good points in there, I would like to hear the counter-arguments.

There are some very good points in there, I would like to hear the counter-arguments.

Fair enough I guess :D
But hasn’t always been like that

Fallout 4 a high? I think many will agree that the previous entries in that series (both NV and 3) where better and that this game, while neither great nor terrible, was the beginning of the downfall (overhyped, buggy, little innovation, okay-ish graphics, most interesting stuff in DLC)

You can understand things in principle, implement them once and still use AI afterwards. That’s basically how uni will work from now (at best). I don’t mourn programming on its own tbh, because in the field you rarely do exiting stuff. And the exiting stuff you will likely still have to do, because it is the hard stuff

If there only were fucking multiple ways to conjure electricity out of thin air…
But there will probably never be magic tech like that

Wdym abscent? The EU was among the first to regulate AI
I mean, it’s not a rounding error, but going from 4.5 billion to 80 billion is not shabby either