That’s fair. It would certainly align with the described “spirit” of the policy. Hopefully it becomes clearer in the future.

Very considerate of you to await him at the destination.

Unless you’re doing something extremely common with well-established patterns, search engines have sucked for the past 14 years and been unusable for the past 8. For most of that time I would just refer to official docs, and official code examples, avoiding stackoverflow and other forums since they were just filled with outdated or plain bad info.

Search engines like Kagi might still be decent, but they are few.

I rely on it to scour the docs, the forums, the codebases for any and all potential solutions and neatly present them to me. I then validate and evaluate myself. Just going with the first thing the AI suggests is lunacy and is exactly what I meant by “people are still discovering best practices”.

It’s literally the first sentence of their policy.

Yes, but what about the 2nd sentence?

The following is not allowed in Nura:

• Submitting contributions fully or in part created by generative AI tools to Nura.
• Recommending generative AI tools to other community members for solving problems in the Nura space.

As you can see, it says nothing about researching, troubleshooting, reverse-engineering, etc. As long as you write and understand the code yourself AI is allowed for everything else. As long as you’re not using generative AI it’s fine.

Citation needed.

My personal experience working with AI over the past year. And if that’s not enough, here’s also Linus Torvalds himself.

The arguments regarding resource use and profiting off of theft are valid. The arguments regarding the nature and capabilities of the tech are not. Developers ARE responsible for the code they submit, regardless of how it was created.

Yeah, I personally prefer the bug-free old version:

On a more serious note, we’re still in a period where people are figuring out what AI can/cannot be used for and what the best practices are. Ironically, since it’s better at reverse engineering and bug hunting than developing when compared to a human, it is more useful for hacker and open-source projects than enterprise.

Diablo-like? This looks more like a vampire survivors type game?