You must log in or register to comment.
- Doomsider@lemmy.worldEnglish19 days
Anyone letting a black box that cannot be audited make decisions should be immediately fired and barred from any leadership position for the rest of their lives.
20 daysoh my fucking god
just dial the doomsday clock to 1am, because we’ll probably miss it anyway if it’s up to a few morons and glorified predictive text, both seemingly in “fucking kill everything” mode
I feel like ballistic missile defense was always his point of Greenland
- TronBronson@lemmy.worldEnglish19 days
To believe that man has any intentions behind is actions is wild. He’s easier to steer than a toddler with sugar treats. Someone told him to do it, everyone else complained, he tripled down to own the libs. He has no long term plans there, someone else might, but unless you can tell me who…we cant really assume assumptions. My guess is Putin told him to do the Greenland thing to destabilize nato
- DrunkenPirate@feddit.orgEnglish20 days
I wonder when does the AI also hallicunate the sources such as webpages, pdfs, reports to prove its hallucinated point.
- Zwuzelmaus@feddit.orgEnglish20 days
Not far. Current LLMs have kinda stubbornness. They cling to their own conclusions even after you told them they are wrong. So if you ask them for proof, then most times they come up with something that’s convincing.
- Capybara_mdp@reddthat.comEnglish19 days
When- they don’t have “stubbornness“- they have a weights set (a weighted probbility table) and a training model (a text file filled with compressed text coordinates) that the llm cant write to to give positive feedback to the weights. It’s less of a matter of “convincing“ and more of an issue of “making the resulting statement logically concurrent with the probability table thats inbuilt into the system by injesting stack overflow vote talley, reddit posts voted most popular” - that makes it hard to “convince”. Since making those weights is very expensive (an energy intensive), the developers usually incorporate the old model into the new one. TLDR: yet again, lazy programming, google up: the y2k date folks in the 70’s.
- Snowclone@lemmy.worldEnglish19 days
another point. the ‘diversity’ in the system is running the model 10k times within the same model, that’s like saying you have a brain trust of 10k experts, except it’s just 10k copies of Gary. they seriously lack creative skills and abstract thought processes because they’re a very complex monoculture with no diversity in the models. and the reason that don’t have 10k unique models running is because that would be incredibly complicated and time consuming and this is a product to sell, not a need being filled.
- 19 days
It’s not “weights” they dont weigh anything - they’re parameters.
See how obtuse thst sounds? They do have a stubbornness, we all know it’s just silicon chips and copper. It can still be stubborn like a stripped screw can be stubborn.
- Capybara_mdp@reddthat.comEnglish13 days
Except a screw doesn’t get anthropomorphized. People don’t kill themselves over screws, or rely upon them for decision making while dropping bombs. And millions of dollars aren’t spent in advertising to convince you that that screws are your friends or will take your job.
- 20 days
That’s how AI is going to kill us… It will fake something and make us bomb ourselves.
- Telorand@reddthat.comEnglish20 days
It doesn’t help that the people currently in charge are fucking stupid, trigger happy, and emotionally insecure.
- Zwuzelmaus@feddit.orgEnglish20 days
the people currently in charge
They don’t even matter, because here it was some expert analyst super hero at work.
