Possibly linux

Ah, that makes sense

Side note: you don’t need multiple ports to have multiple subnets. (You can just use vlans)

Put AI in the name and then sell it for like 40 million dollars

Why not use CoMaps?

Do you have any network segmentation is all your stuff on the same lan?

You also could try IPv6 public or private addresses

TrueNAS Scale is cool but I moved away from it as it is a pain and not terribly open

I run podman in proxmox vms

300 EUR is a lot of money depending on who you are

XMPP died along side XML. Outside of a few greybeards no one really uses it. I’m not sure why Lemmy seems to be so obsessed with a dead technology

True but if you look online Chrome OS devices are dirt cheap. The major trade off is that storage is limited

I would instead look into old Chromeboxes. They have about the same compute but don’t have a battery and can typically run mainline Linux (assuming they are supported by mrchromebox)

You go to a different CA

You do make a good point. However, Let’s encrypt is run by the IRSG which is a non profit focused on improving internet security. They are the ones who are pushing for shorter certificate lifetimes among other things.

Maybe I’m mistaken but aren’t the logs cryptography verifiable? (As in you can’t create a rouge cert without it creating a trace)

Let’s encrypt is very transparent and has been designed to be auditable. What are you worried about exactly?

This is a bit more complex that it needs to be

Why didn’t you just use the openwrt Firewall? Admittedly I just skimmed this but couldn’t just allowed your server to talk to the camera via a Firewall rule?

Not web based but you could always use Samba

You absolutely shouldn’t be exposing service on your computer to the internet

Firewalls (not NAT) exist for a reason

You really should disclose this as AI slop

You can use Tor snowflakes or bridges to bypass restrictions

Not being impacted by security issues like these for one